Writing is not everyone’s cup of tea. But following our simple tips on essay writing, you will make sure it is not true. The essay writing guidelines we are going to demonstrate will be based on the topic “Civil Rights Movement in the U.S.”. The topic is quite complex, but there is no need to worry! We will help you cope with it in the twinkling of an eye!
First of all, work on your essay in accordance with the standard scheme. Take into consideration three main sections of the typical essay: introduction, main part (body), and conclusion.
We will show up the essay writing process on the example of the “Southern California Environmental Disaster – Wildfires” topic.
Creating your own piece of work, first of all, requires well-planned work process. To start with, it is recommended to build up an outline for your essay. Let us use as an example the topic “The opportunities that globalization provides will lead to a more equitable world”.
The structure we are going to offer is typical and standard, that is: introduction, body, and conclusion.
Before you start working on the pathos material, it is important to realize the whole concept of this notion. Emotional appeal is an art which arouses feelings of different nature, such as sympathy, sorrow, pity or tenderness.
Very often when you are trying to stimulate or convince your audience, you need to take into consideration emotional reaction from the audience. Remember, using pathos can be of great importance while you create your own piece of work. It can help you control the emotional reaction from your audience more effectively.
Writing editorial is quite different from the news story writing. In case with the latter one, the comments and points of views are not welcome. In case with editorial, it is based on the opinions and is supported by the facts. They are usually written by such people as newspaper editors or columnists. To write an editorial can be called a real privilege. With our simple steps you can find out how to write good editorial on your own.
The general idea behind the raising of alcoholic drinking age is that it protects young people who are still incapable of accepting responsibilities, from the abuse of alcohol. It is, however, very doubtful whether it performs this function.
The matter is, the more something is prohibited, the more appealing it looks for those who are prohibited to do it. A person who would have been drinking from time to time, if he were allowed to, will be drinking immoderately and in secret if he is forbidden to do it, for the simple reason of it being cool. Moreover, with the minimum alcohol drinking age being 21 years, the situation looks especially ridiculous. At 18 people are considered to be mature enough to take responsibilities, get married, vote, sign contracts and be persecuted by law if they break it; but officially they still are not allowed to drink until they turn 21.
In this or that form military recruiters were often associated with high schools; yet, with the beginning of the Iraq War this presence became much more noticeable and led to controversy in the recent years. For some reasons, the society and, most notably, parents consider high school students to be far less intelligent than the ones studying in college, only a couple of years older, and try to prevent them from taking rash decisions.
The main problem with questions like this one is their, on the one hand, ambiguity and, on the other hand, relentlessness with which those who ask them require to be answered. What kind of decisions? About what? If we think along the lines presupposed by the question, we should define the unified age when teenagers should be let to both choose what they would have for breakfast and whom to marry.
The whole idea of imposing the usage of biofuels looks precisely like what it actually is – hysteria sponsored by governments and enforced by ecologists.
The idea of forcing the racing industry to use them looks all this plus also mad. What is it supposed to achieve? Decrease in the use of fossil fuels? All the fuel used by the racing industry is less than a drop in the ocean of what is used by usual motorists; even if all of this will be substituted by biofuels, it won’t make any difference – however difference it is supposed to make.
This idea may look ridiculous and absurd, yet be sure that there is always someone who just dreams about restricting the list of products people are allowed to eat or, on the contrary, wants to make people eat certain products. Such ideas are never about the ones who create them – they either already follow that idea or don’t care about the sphere restricted by it altogether. These people care only about changing the life of others, not their own ones.